Impact on learning and achievementIt is
generally believed that ICTs can empower teachers and learners, making
significant contributions to learning and achievement. However, current
research on the impacts of ICTs on student achievement yields few
conclusive statements, pro or con, about the use of ICTs in education.
Studies have shown that even in the most advanced schools in
industrialized countries, ICTs are generally not considered central to
the teaching and learning process. Moreover, there appears to be a
mismatch between methods used to measure effects and the type of
learning promoted. Standardized testing, for example, tends to measure
the results of traditional teaching practices, rather than new knowledge
and skills related to the use of ICTs. It is clear that more research
needs to be conducted to understand the complex links between ICTs,
learning, and achievement.
Monitoring and evaluation
Many of the issues and challenges associated with ICTs in education initiatives are known by policymakers, donor staff, and educators. However, data on the nature and complexity of these issues remains limited because of the lack of good monitoring and evaluation tools and processes. Where evaluation data is available much of the work is seen to suffer from important biases. Another problem in this area is the lack of a common set of indicators for ICTs in education. And, where data has been collected, it is often quantitative data related to infrastructure (number of computers, for example) rather than data that can help policymakers gauge the impact of ICT interventions on student learning.
Many of the issues and challenges associated with ICTs in education initiatives are known by policymakers, donor staff, and educators. However, data on the nature and complexity of these issues remains limited because of the lack of good monitoring and evaluation tools and processes. Where evaluation data is available much of the work is seen to suffer from important biases. Another problem in this area is the lack of a common set of indicators for ICTs in education. And, where data has been collected, it is often quantitative data related to infrastructure (number of computers, for example) rather than data that can help policymakers gauge the impact of ICT interventions on student learning.
If ICTs are to become effective and integral tools in
education, and if accountability is to be demonstrated to donors and
stakeholders, monitoring and evaluation must be a priority area of
focus.
Equity It
is clear that there are equity issues related to the uses of ICTs in
education. There is a real danger that uses of ICTs can further
marginalize groups already excluded or on the edge of educational
practices and innovations. On the other hand, with supportive policies
and careful planning and monitoring, ICTs hold out the promise of
facilitating greater inclusion of such group.
.
While there is much
research on the impact of ICTs and marginalized groups in
industrialized countries, there has been limited research into these
issues in developing countries. There seems to be little question,
however, that ICTs generally give preference to schools and learners in
urban areas and in areas where existing infrastructure is the best.
Research related to equity and ICTs to date has focused primarily on
access to particular technologies. Much less attention has been given to
how specific types and uses of ICTs are related to equity issues.